
〔中央社〕英國4日舉行國會大選,出口民調顯示工黨有望囊括逾6成席次大勝,黨魁施凱爾將成為下任首相。雖然英國睽違14年將再由偏左的工黨執政,預料對外政策會維持全然不變。
● 國會650席 工黨有望豪取410席
根據英國廣播公司(BBC)的最新預測,英國下議院650席裡工黨可望拿下410席,遠高於過半門檻326席;執政14年的保守黨暴跌至144席,中間派自由民主黨58席。極右民粹的英國改革黨(Reform UK)4席,打破前身脫歐黨2019年時一席未上窘況。
工黨這次在下議院席次可望比在野各黨合計多170席,雖略低於1997年在布萊爾(Tony Blair)領導時締造高出在野179席,但堪稱重返巔峰;2019年保守黨在富個人魅力的強生(Boris Johnson)帶領下勝出,也不過只贏在野80席。
紐約時報指出,61歲的施凱爾(Keir Starmer)曾為人權律師,這次靠著最近3任保守黨首相執政不利,帶領工黨從2019年時遭逢自1930年代以來最慘的敗仗一舉翻身。
倫敦智庫「歐洲變動下的英國」(UK in a Changing Europe)研究員魯特(Jill Rutter)說:「他(施凱爾)在紀律方面向來一絲不苟,有人甚至以乏味來形容。他不會搞煽情那套,但看起來相對更有首相樣子。」
● 一絲不苟無星味 施凱爾可望成近年最平民首相
施凱爾成長於倫敦近郊莎麗郡(Surrey)一個左翼的勞工家庭,與父親不太親,護理師母親因患病而常進出醫院。施凱爾是家中第一個大學畢業生,先在里茲大學(Leeds University),之後在牛津大學攻讀法律。
施凱爾直到52歲才投身政界,2015年當選國會議員。2020年從柯賓(Jeremy Corbyn)手中接下跌至谷底的工黨,開始為黨重塑。施凱爾捨棄柯賓擬將英國能源企業國有化構想,並承諾不會提高薪資家庭的稅賦;他也大力支持軍隊,扭轉工黨在柯賓時代被貼上的不愛國標籤,並根除柯賓時期黨內反猶氛圍。
華盛頓郵報指出,施凱爾的反差性十足。年輕時當過左翼「托洛斯基」(Trotsky)雜誌主編,但今年將「創造財富」置於工黨政綱核心讓資本家快慰。他曾是位反君主主義者,後來受封爵士,如今更每週見英王一次。他將是幾十年來最「勞工階級」的英相,與現任首相蘇納克(Rishi Sunak)富可敵國對比鮮明。
施凱爾在這次選舉期間沒接受外媒採訪,身邊的同事稱他「非常注重隱私」;施凱爾的猶太裔妻子維多利亞(Victoria)在國民保健署(NHS)上班、兩個十幾歲的孩子姓名還沒對外公布過。他曾說擔心搬進首相官邸會為家人帶來困擾。
施凱爾不是個有星味的政治人物。作為一名靠說話吃飯的人,他不像邱吉爾(Winston Churchill)有渲染力;朋友說他可以做到鐵石心腸,然而這可能正是當前內外疲敝的英國所需要的領袖。
中間派智庫「共同勞動」(Labour Together)的執行長塞門斯(Josh Simons)說:「施凱爾相信實用主義,研擬政策時講究解決問題而非泛泛理論,也不太搞意識形態那套。」
● 專注內政經濟 挺烏挺以等外交政策不變
左派裡的批評者懷疑施凱爾上任會貿然「向左轉」,應會走溫和的中間路線。
施凱爾可望將大部分注意力放在國內政治—嘗試撐起英國經濟、解決人們對生活物價失控飆漲的無力感。他想透過一家新的國營綠色公用事業公司來降低不斷飆升的用電成本,也想縮短求診和牙科預約等待時間。
歷來英國出現新政府後,外交政策也鮮少改變。倫敦政經學院政治專家崔維茲(Tony Travers)認為,儘管政黨輪替,英國外交政策「會不動如山到令人訝異」。施凱爾先前已表示,英國將繼續作為北約重要成員,會繼續支持烏克蘭抵抗俄羅斯;雖呼籲停火,但支持以色列擁有抵禦哈瑪斯的自衛權。
雖然英國脫歐堪稱失敗,但如今已沒人熱衷於再搞入歐公投,不過施凱爾治下的英國可能會尋求與歐盟建立更密切關係。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/4727071
〔中央社〕領導工黨在4日國會大選取得壓倒性勝利的黨魁施凱爾今天就任首相。他在唐寧街10號首相官邸外發表就職演說指出,政府只能以「行動」、而非言詞挽回民眾信任。
他強調,政治可以是良善的力量,「我們將證明這一點」。他重申,他將永遠「將國家擺第一,政黨擺第二」。
英國國會下議院改選650席,工黨斬獲超過400席,為保守黨長達14年的執政畫下句點。施凱爾(Keir Starmer)按慣例前往白金漢宮晉見國王查爾斯三世(King Charles III),隨後於唐寧街發表就任演說。
他是英國自2022年以來,第4位首相。
施凱爾首先感謝卸任首相蘇納克(Rishi Sunak)對國家的奉獻和勤奮工作,並提到身為英國史上第一位亞裔首相,蘇納克為達成這項成就所需加倍付出的努力,「不應被任何人低估」。
這番話可被詮釋為回應偏極右民粹政黨「英國改革黨」(Reform UK)部分支持者近日對蘇納克的種族歧視攻擊,以及該黨黨魁法拉吉(Nigel Farage)稱蘇納克「不懂我們的文化」。
施凱爾指出,英國已果斷選擇「改變」,並選擇「讓政治回歸服務公眾」。他提到,當人們的犧牲以及他們從政治人物得到的服務落差「這麼大」,這就讓國民「心累」,對更美好未來的期望也逐漸幻滅。
他說,這樣的群體創傷以及隨之而來的缺乏信任感,只能靠「行動」、而非言語療癒,「我們今天就可以開始」。
他提到,執政者首先必須意識到服務公眾是項「特權」,而政府「必須以同等尊重對待國內每一個人」。
施凱爾說:「無論你是否投票支持工黨,我都可以直接告訴你,我的政府會服務你。」他提到,這事實上尤其適用未投工黨的選民。
保守黨過去14年執政後期令民眾對政治人物的不信任感、以及相對剝奪感加深。施凱爾今天說,有數以百萬計英國民眾的生活越來越不安全穩定,但政治人物長期對這樣的現象視而不見,只要「攝影機沒在拍」,就可以無視民眾生活實況。他強調:「這次不會這樣了。」
不過,施凱爾提到,儘管相關工作即刻啟動,改變一個國家不是「按下開關」這麼簡單,需要時間,特別是當世界較以往變幻無常。
他說,他將「一磚一瓦」、穩健有耐心地重建國家,建設讓不分階層的民眾都能享有人生機會的基礎設施,讓更多人相信下一代將生活在更好的英國。
妻子維多莉亞(Victoria Starmer)今天陪同施凱爾發表演說,兩人的座車一接近柵門,即引發提早在唐寧街列隊等候的選戰夥伴歡呼。這些支持者手持組成英國的英格蘭、威爾斯、蘇格蘭和北愛爾蘭旗幟,象徵全國各地對施凱爾的支持,並呼應他的「國家復興」、以及團結一致面對不安全世界的號召。
施凱爾在極左派前任黨魁柯賓(Jeremy Corbyn)將工黨在英國的支持度帶往低點後,於2020年接任黨魁,並鐵腕改造工黨、致力排除黨內極端勢力,終在此次大選贏得他形容為「歷史性」的勝利。
不過,儘管唐寧街氣氛熱烈,多名專家指出,工黨此次勝利缺乏厚實基礎。有英國「民調大師」之稱的政治學者柯蒂斯(John Curtice)分析,工黨全國得票率估計僅約34%,是歷來贏得執政權的英國國會多數黨最低得票率。
此外,儘管選前多項民調顯示工黨的民意支持度穩定領先保守黨約20個百分點,得票率顯示,工黨僅領先保守黨約10個百分點。
此次大選投票率也偏低,僅約6成。施凱爾還得面對小黨崛起的挑戰。此次保守黨和工黨兩大黨得票率低於6成。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/4727728
Sir Keir Starmer | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Official portrait, 2024 | |||
| Prime Minister of the United Kingdom | |||
| Assumed office 5 July 2024 | |||
| Monarch | Charles III | ||
| Deputy | Angela Rayner | ||
| Preceded by | Rishi Sunak | ||
| Leader of the Opposition | |||
| In office 4 April 2020 – 5 July 2024 | |||
| Monarchs |
| ||
| Prime Minister |
| ||
| Deputy | Angela Rayner | ||
| Preceded by | Jeremy Corbyn | ||
| Succeeded by | Rishi Sunak | ||
| Leader of the Labour Party | |||
| Assumed office 4 April 2020 | |||
| Deputy | Angela Rayner | ||
| Preceded by | Jeremy Corbyn | ||
| |||
| Assumed office 7 May 2015 | |||
| Preceded by | Frank Dobson | ||
| Majority | 11,572 (30.0%) | ||
| Director of Public Prosecutions | |||
| In office 1 November 2008 – 1 November 2013 | |||
| Appointed by | Patricia Scotland | ||
| Preceded by | Ken Macdonald | ||
| Succeeded by | Alison Saunders | ||
| Personal details | |||
| Born | Keir Rodney Starmer 2 September 1962 London, England | ||
| Political party | Labour | ||
| Spouse | |||
| Children | 2 | ||
| Residences |
| ||
| Education | |||
| Occupation |
| ||
| Signature | |||
| Website | keirstarmer | ||
| ||
|---|---|---|
Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
Policies Elections
| ||
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer KCB KC (/ˈkɪər/ ; born 2 September 1962) is a British politician and barrister who has served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom since 2024, as Leader of the Labour Party since 2020, and previously served as Leader of the Opposition from 2020 to 2024. He has been Member of Parliament (MP) for Holborn and St Pancras since 2015, and previously was Director of Public Prosecutions from 2008 to 2013.
Born in London and raised in Surrey, Starmer attended the selective state Reigate Grammar School, which became a private school while he was a student. He was politically active from an early age and joined the Labour Party Young Socialists at the age of 16. He graduated with a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of Leeds in 1985 and gained a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law degree at St Edmund Hall at the University of Oxford in 1986. After being called to the bar, Starmer practised predominantly in criminal defence work, specialising in human rights. He served as a human rights adviser to the Northern Ireland Policing Board and was appointed a Queen's Counsel in 2002; his Northern Ireland policing work influencing his decision to pursue a political career. During his time as Director of Public Prosecutions, he dealt with a number of major cases including the Stephen Lawrence murder case. He was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) in the 2014 New Year Honours for services to law and criminal justice.
Starmer was elected to the House of Commons at the 2015 general election. As a backbencher, he supported the unsuccessful Britain Stronger in Europe campaign in the 2016 European Union membership referendum. He was appointed to Jeremy Corbyn's shadow cabinet as Shadow Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, and advocated a proposed second referendum on Brexit. Following Corbyn's resignation after Labour's defeat at the 2019 general election, Starmer succeeded him by winning the 2020 leadership election on a left-wing platform. During his tenure as opposition leader, Starmer moved the party back more toward the centre, and emphasised the importance of eliminating antisemitism within the party. Starmer led Labour to victory in the local elections in 2023 and 2024. In 2023, Starmer set out five missions for his government, targeting issues such as economic growth, health, clean energy, crime and education.[1]
In July 2024, Starmer led Labour to a landslide victory at the 2024 general election, ending fourteen years of Conservative government with Labour becoming the largest party in the House of Commons.[2] He succeeded Rishi Sunak as prime minister on 5 July 2024, becoming the first Labour prime minister since Gordon Brown in 2010 and the first one to win a general election since Tony Blair at the 2005 general election.[3]
Starmer was born on 2 September 1962 in Southwark, London.[4][5] He grew up in the town of Oxted in Surrey.[6][7][8] He was the second of the four children of Josephine (née Baker), a nurse, and Rodney Starmer, a toolmaker.[8][9][10] His mother had Still's disease.[11][12] His parents were Labour Party supporters, and reportedly named him after the party's first parliamentary leader, Keir Hardie,[13][14] though Starmer said in 2015 that he did not know whether this is true.[15]

He passed the 11-plus examination and gained entry to Reigate Grammar School, then a voluntary aided selective grammar school.[14] The school was converted into an independent fee-paying school in 1976, while he was a student. The terms of the conversion were such that his parents were not required to pay for his schooling until he turned 16, and when he reached that point, the school, now a charity, awarded him a bursary that allowed him to complete his education there without any parental contribution.[16][17][18] The subjects that he chose for specialist study in his last two years at school were mathematics, music and physics, in which he achieved A level grades of B, B and C.[19] Among his classmates were the musician Norman Cook, alongside whom Starmer took violin lessons; Andrew Cooper, who went on to become a Conservative peer; and the future conservative journalist Andrew Sullivan. According to Starmer, he and Sullivan "fought over everything ... Politics, religion. You name it."[8]
In his teenage years, Starmer was active in Labour politics; he was a member of the Labour Party Young Socialists at the age of 16.[10][8] He was a junior exhibitioner at the Guildhall School of Music and Drama until the age of 18, and played the flute, piano, recorder, and violin.[20] In the early 1980s, Starmer was caught by police illegally selling ice creams while trying to raise money during a holiday to the French Riviera. He escaped the incident without punishment, beyond the ice creams being confiscated.[21][22] Starmer studied law at the University of Leeds, becoming a member of the university's Labour Club and graduating with first class honours and a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) degree in 1985, becoming the first member of his family to graduate.[13][23] He undertook postgraduate studies at St Edmund Hall, Oxford, graduating from the University of Oxford as a Bachelor of Civil Law (BCL) in 1986.[24][13] From 1986 to 1987, Starmer served as the editor of Socialist Alternatives, a Trotskyist radical magazine. The magazine was produced by an organisation under the same name, which represented the British section of the International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency (IRMT).[25][26]
Starmer became a barrister in 1987 at the Middle Temple, becoming a bencher there in 2009.[4] He served as a legal officer for the campaign group Liberty until 1990.[13] Starmer was a member of Doughty Street Chambers from 1990 onwards, primarily working on human rights issues.[11][13] He was called to the bar in several Caribbean countries,[27] where he defended convicts sentenced to the death penalty.[8] In 1999, Starmer was a junior barrister on Lee Clegg's appeal.[28] Starmer assisted Helen Steel and David Morris in the McLibel case, in the trial and appeal in English courts, also represented them at the European court.[29] Starmer was appointed Queen's Counsel on 9 April 2002, aged 39.[30] In the same year, he became joint head of Doughty Street Chambers. In 2005, Starmer stated "I got made a Queen’s Counsel, which is odd since I often used to propose the abolition of the monarchy".[31]
Starmer served as a human rights adviser to the Northern Ireland Policing Board and the Association of Chief Police Officers, and was also a member of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office's death penalty advisory panel from 2002 to 2008.[4][13] The Northern Ireland board was an important part of bringing communities together following the Good Friday Agreement, and Starmer later cited his work on policing in Northern Ireland as being a key influence on his decision to pursue a political career: "Some of the things I thought that needed to change in police services we achieved more quickly than we achieved in strategic litigation ... I came better to understand how you can change by being inside and getting the trust of people".[32]

In July 2008, Patricia Scotland, Attorney General for England and Wales, named Starmer as the new head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Director of Public Prosecutions. He took over from Ken Macdonald, who publicly welcomed the appointment, on 1 November 2008.[13][14] Starmer was considered to be bringing a focus on human rights into the legal system.[13] In 2011, he introduced reforms that included the "first test paperless hearing".[33] During his time in the role, Starmer dealt with a number of major cases including the Stephen Lawrence murder case.[34]
In February 2010, Starmer announced the CPS's decision to prosecute three Labour MPs and a Conservative peer for offences relating to false accounting in the aftermath of the parliamentary expenses scandal, who were all found guilty.[35][36] During the 2011 England riots, Starmer prioritised rapid prosecutions of rioters over long sentences, which he later thought had helped to bring "the situation back under control".[37][38] In February 2012, Starmer announced that Chris Huhne would be prosecuted for perverting the course of justice, saying in relation to the case that "[w]here there is sufficient evidence we do not shy away from prosecuting politicians".[39] In 2013, Starmer announced changes to how sexual abuse investigations are handled amid Operation Yewtree, including a panel to review historic complaints.[40][41][42]
Starmer stepped down as Director of Public Prosecutions in November 2013, and was replaced by Alison Saunders.[43][44] From 2011 to 2014, Starmer received honorary degrees from several universities, and he was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) in the 2014 New Year Honours for services to law and criminal justice.[45][46]
Starmer was selected in December 2014 to be the Labour parliamentary candidate for the Labour UK constituency of Holborn and St Pancras, a safe seat, following the decision of the sitting MP Frank Dobson to retire.[47] Starmer was elected at the 2015 general election with a majority of 17,048.[48] He was re-elected at the 2017 general election with an increased majority of 30,509, and re-elected again at the 2019 general election but with a reduced majority of 27,763. In June 2024, Starmer was re-elected as the Labour candidate for Holborn and St Pancras at the 2024 general election.
As a backbencher, Starmer supported the unsuccessful Britain Stronger in Europe campaign in the 2016 European Union membership referendum.[49] He became a member of the parliamentarian groups Labour Friends of Israel and Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East.[50] Starmer was urged by a number of activists to stand in the 2015 Labour Party leadership election following the resignation of Ed Miliband as Leader of the Labour Party after the 2015 general election. He ruled this out, citing his relative lack of political experience at the time.[51][52] During the leadership election, Starmer supported Andy Burnham, who finished second to Jeremy Corbyn.[53]

Starmer was appointed to the Corbyn shadow cabinet as Shadow Minister for Immigration; part of the ministerial team for Burnham. In June 2016, Starmer resigned from this role as part of the widespread shadow cabinet resignations in protest at Corbyn's leadership; in his resignation letter he wrote that it was "simply untenable now to suggest we can offer an effective opposition without a change of leader".[54][55] Following Corbyn's win in the 2016 Labour Party leadership election in September, Starmer accepted a new post under Corbyn as Shadow Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, replacing Emily Thornberry.[56] On taking up the role, Starmer resigned from a consultancy position with the law firm specialising in human rights, Mishcon de Reya, that had acted for Gina Miller in bringing legal proceedings against the government.[57]
In his role as Shadow Brexit Secretary, Starmer questioned the government's destination for the UK outside of the European Union (EU), as well as calling for Brexit plans to be made public. On 6 December 2016, then prime minister Theresa May confirmed the publication of Brexit plans, in what some considered a victory for Starmer.[58] He argued that the government would be needed to pass a large number of new laws quickly, or risk what he called an "unsustainable legal vacuum", if Britain left the EU without a deal.[59] At the Labour Party Conference in September 2018, Starmer advocated for a referendum on the Brexit withdrawal agreement, saying that "our options must include campaigning for a public vote, and nobody is ruling out remain as an option".[60]
In January 2017, Starmer called for a reform to the EU free movement rules following Brexit and for a "fundamental rethink of immigration rules from start to finish".[61] In his first interview after being appointed to the shadow cabinet, Starmer said that immigration should be reduced after Britain left the EU by "making sure we have the skills in this country".[62] Starmer had told Politico in November 2016 that negotiations with the EU should start on the understanding that there must be "some change" to freedom of movement rules, given that remaining in the EU single market is no longer a reality.[63] In May 2017, Starmer said that "free movement has to go" but that it was important to allow EU citizens to migrate to the UK once they had a job offer, given the importance of immigration for the UK's economy.[64] Starmer was a supporter of a proposed second referendum on Brexit.[65]
Following the party's defeat at the 2019 general election, Corbyn announced that he would not lead Labour at the next general election.[66] Starmer began to distance himself from Corbyn's leadership and many of the policies he put forward at the election, revealing in 2024 that he was "certain that we would lose the 2019 election".[67] On 4 January 2020, Starmer announced his candidacy for the resultant leadership election.[68][69][70] By 8 January, it was reported that he had gained enough nominations from Labour MPs and MEPs to get onto the ballot paper, and that the trade union Unison was backing him. Unison, with 1.3 million members, said Starmer was the best placed candidate to unite the party and regain public trust.[71] He also gained support from former Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Mayor of London Sadiq Khan.[72] During the leadership election, Starmer ran a left-wing platform. He positioned himself in opposition to austerity, stating that Corbyn was "right" to position Labour as the "party of anti-austerity".[73][74] He indicated he would continue with the Labour policy of scrapping tuition fees as well as pledging "common ownership" of rail, mail, energy and water companies and called for ending outsourcing in the NHS, local governments and the justice system.[75] Starmer was announced as the winner of the leadership contest on 4 April 2020, defeating rivals Rebecca Long-Bailey and Lisa Nandy, with 56.2% of the vote in the first round.[76][77][78]

Having become Leader of the Opposition amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Starmer said in his acceptance speech that he would refrain from "scoring party political points" and would work with the government "in the national interest".[79] He later became more critical of the government's response to the pandemic following the Partygate scandal.[80] Amid the historic number of ministers resigning from Boris Johnson's government in July 2022, Starmer proposed a vote of no confidence in the government, stating that Johnson could not be allowed to remain in office given the large-scale revolt by his own ministers.[81][82]

Starmer also criticised Johnson's government, as well as the governments of his successors Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak, for issues such as the Chris Pincher scandal and subsequent government crisis, the economic crisis resulting from the 2022 mini-budget and subsequent government crisis, the cost of living crisis and the National Health Service strikes and other industrial disputes and strikes.
As Labour Leader, Starmer focused on repositioning the party away from the left and the controversies that plagued Corbyn's leadership,[83] with promises of economic stability, tackling small boat crossings, cutting NHS waiting times, energy independence and infrastructure development, tackling crime, and recruiting 6,500 teachers.
His Shadow Cabinet appointments included MPs associated with the various wings of the party. Angela Rayner was appointed deputy labour leader and shadow deputy prime minister, while Rachel Reeves and Yvette Cooper were appointed as shadow chancellor and shadow home secretary, respectively. Former Labour leader Ed Miliband was appointed shadow energy and climate secretary. Other notable appointments included David Lammy as shadow foreign secretary and Wes Streeting as shadow health secretary.[84][85]
Starmer considered quitting after the party's mixed results in the 2021 local elections, the first local elections of his leadership, but later felt "vindicated" by his decision to stay on, saying "I did [consider quitting] because I didn't feel that I should be bigger than the party and that if I couldn't bring about the change, perhaps there should be a change. But actually, in the end, I reflected on it, talked to very many people and doubled down and determined, no, it is the change in the Labour Party we need."[86]
During Starmer's tenure as opposition leader, his party suffered the loss of a previously Labour seat in the 2021 Hartlepool by-election, followed by holds in the 2021 Batley and Spen by-election, 2022 Birmingham Erdington by-election and 2022 City of Chester by-election, and a gain from the Conservatives in the 2022 Wakefield by-election. During the 2023 local elections, Labour gained more than 500 councillors and 22 councils, becoming the largest party in local government for the first time since 2002.[87] Labour made further gains in the 2024 local elections, including winning the West Midlands mayoral election.[88]
– Labour Manifesto Launch, 13 June 2024
In June 2024, Starmer released the Labour Party manifesto Change, which focuses on economic growth, planning system reforms, infrastructure, what Starmer describes as "clean energy", healthcare, education, childcare, and strengthening workers' rights.[89][90] It pledges a new publicly owned energy company (Great British Energy), a "Green Prosperity Plan", reducing patient waiting times in the NHS, and renationalisation of the railway network (Great British Railways).[91] It includes wealth creation and "pro-business and pro-worker" policies.[92] The manifesto also pledged to give votes to 16 year olds, reform the House of Lords, and to tax private schools, with money generated going into improving state education.[93][94]
In July 2024, Starmer led Labour to a landslide victory in the 2024 general election, ending fourteen years of Conservative government with Labour becoming the largest party in the House of Commons.[2] In his victory speech, Starmer thanked party workers for their hard work – including nearly five years of revamping and rebranding Labour in the face of Tory dominance – and urged them to savour the moment, but warned them of challenges ahead and pledged his government would work for "national renewal":[95]

As the leader of the majority party in the House of Commons, Starmer was appointed as prime minister by Charles III on 5 July 2024, becoming the first Labour prime minister since Gordon Brown and the first one to win a general election since Tony Blair.[3] He was driven from Buckingham Palace to Downing Street, where he was greeted by a crowd of supporters and gave his first speech as prime minister. In his speech, Starmer paid tribute to Sunak, saying "his achievement as the first British Asian Prime Minister of our country should not be underestimated by anyone" and he also recognised "the dedication and hard work he brought to his leadership", but added that the people of Britain had voted for change:[96]
Other world leaders including Joe Biden and Justin Trudeau, as well as former Labour Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, congratulated Starmer after he was appointed prime minister.[97]

Starmer has begun selecting his cabinet ministers after his appointment as prime minister. He is forming his government from 5–7 July, with the new Cabinet first meeting on 6 July,[98] and the new Parliament being called to meet on 9 July.[99] Angela Rayner was appointed Deputy Prime Minister and Rachel Reeves was appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer, with Reeves becoming the first woman to serve as chancellor. Other appointments include David Lammy as Foreign Secretary, Yvette Cooper as Home Secretary, and Wes Streeting as Health Secretary.[100]
The incoming Starmer ministry was noted for its female political representation, appointing women to a record half of the Cabinet, including the first female Chancellor in British history, and three of the five top political positions in the British government.[101][102]
Starmer's politics have been described as unclear and "hard to define".[103][104][105] When elected as Labour leader, he was widely believed to belong to the soft left of the Labour Party;[106] he has since moved to the political centre-ground,[107][108] and has been widely compared to Tony Blair's leadership and New Labour, having taken the party rightward to gain electability.[109] Despite this, it has been argued that "Labour under Starmer has advanced a politics of anti-neoliberalism like that of Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell", that it is "best understood as a party aspiring to restructure an economic model perceived to have failed", and that in that sense "it differs markedly from New Labour".[109] The term "Starmerism" has been coined to refer to Starmer's political ideology, and his supporters have been called Starmerites.[110][111] In June 2023, Starmer gave an interview to Time where he was asked to define Starmerism:[112]
In April 2023, Starmer gave an interview to The Economist on defining Starmerism.[111][113] In this interview, two main strands of Starmerism were identified.[113] The first strand focused on a critique of the British state for being too ineffective and overcentralised. The answer to this critique was to base governance on five main missions to be followed over two terms of government; these missions would determine all government policy. The second strand was the adherence to an economic policy of "modern supply-side economics" based on expanding economic productivity by increasing participation in the labour market, reforming public services, increasing state intervention, mitigating the impact of Brexit and simplifying the construction planning process.[113]
Starmer has described the Labour Party as "deeply patriotic" and credits its most successful leaders, Clement Attlee, Harold Wilson, and Tony Blair, for policies "rooted in the everyday concerns of working people".[114] Starmer advocates a government based on "security, prosperity and respect". In a speech on 13 May 2023, Starmer stated:

Starmer has moved the Labour Party towards the political centre.[116] He pledged to end antisemitism in the party during his acceptance speech, saying: "Antisemitism has been a stain on our party. I have seen the grief that it's brought to so many Jewish communities. On behalf of the Labour Party, I am sorry. And I will tear out this poison by its roots and judge success by the return of Jewish members and those who felt that they could no longer support us."[117][118] In October 2020, following the release of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC)'s report into antisemitism in the party, Starmer accepted its findings in full and apologised to Jews on behalf of the party.[119][120] In February 2023, Starmer's antisemitism reforms resulted in the party no longer being monitored by the EHRC.[121] His supporters praised him for his antisemitism reforms and for helping to improve Labour's credibility with the electorate, while his critics characterise him as dishonest and factional for discarding many of the policies he pledged to uphold and aggressively marginalising the party's left, with many prominent members (including his predecessor Corbyn) being deprived of the whip or outright expelled under his leadership.[122][123]
In June 2024, Starmer pledged to reduce record high legal immigration to the United Kingdom. Net migration to the UK was 685,000 in 2023.[124] On foreign policy, Starmer marched and authored legal opinions against the Iraq War following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, stating in 2015 that he believed that the war was "not lawful under international law because there was no UN resolution expressly authorising it."[125][126] During the Israel–Hamas war, Starmer received criticism over his initial refusal to call for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip amid the Israeli bombardment; he later called for a ceasefire.[127] Starmer has pledged support for Ukraine during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and told Volodomyr Zelenskyy that there would be no change in Britain's position on the war in Ukraine under his leadership.[128]

Starmer met Victoria Alexander, then a solicitor, in the early 2000s while he was a senior barrister with Doughty Street Chambers and they were working on the same case. The two eventually became close, becoming engaged in 2004 and married on 6 May 2007 on the Fennes Estate in Essex.[129][130] The couple have two children, a son, who was born a year after their wedding, and a daughter, born two years after that. Both are being brought up in the Jewish faith of their mother.[131][132] Until moving to Downing Street, the couple resided in Kentish Town, north London.[133][134][135]
Starmer is a pescatarian, and his wife is a vegetarian. They raised their children as vegetarians until they were 10 years old, at which point they were given the option of eating meat.[136] In an interview during the 2024 general election, Starmer revealed that the thing he feared most about becoming prime minister is the impact it may have on his children, due to their "difficult ages" and how it would be easier if they were younger or older.[137] Starmer said in a radio interview that he would try to avoid working after 6 p.m. on Fridays in order to observe Shabbat dinners and spend time with his family.[138]
Starmer is an atheist; he chose to take a "solemn affirmation" (rather than an oath) of allegiance to the monarch.[139] Starmer has said that he does not believe in God, but believes in the power of faith to bring people together.[140] He and his family occasionally attend a liberal synagogue,[141] and he stated in a 2022 interview that his children are being brought up to know the Jewish faith and background of their maternal grandparents.[131]
Starmer is a keen footballer, having played for Homerton Academicals, a north London amateur team,[14] and he supports Premier League side Arsenal.[8]
In 2002, Starmer was appointed Queen's Counsel (QC).[142] He received the Bar Council's Sydney Elland Goldsmith Award in 2005 for his outstanding contribution to pro bono work in challenging the death penalty in Uganda, Kenya, Malawi, and the Caribbean.[143] He is also a Honorary Fellow of St Edmund Hall, Oxford.[144]
Starmer was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) in the 2014 New Year Honours for "services to law and criminal justice".[46][145] He was sworn into the Privy Council of the United Kingdom on 19 July 2017.[146] This enabled him to be styled "The Right Honourable".[147]
| Date | School | Degree |
|---|---|---|
| 21 July 2011 | University of Essex | Doctor of university (D.U.)[148] |
| 16 July 2012 | University of Leeds | Doctor of Laws (LL.D.)[149] |
| 19 November 2013 | University of East London | Honorary doctorate[45] |
| 19 December 2013 | London School of Economics | Doctor of Laws (LL.D.)[150][151] |
| 14 July 2014 | University of Reading | Doctor of Laws (LL.D.)[152] |
| 18 November 2014 | University of Worcester | Honorary doctorate[153] |

英國首相施凱爾今天晚間與烏克蘭總統澤倫斯基通話,提到烏克蘭在戰爭期間暫停選舉是合理之舉,一如英國在第二次世界大戰(1939至1945年)期間。(路透)
〔中央社〕英國首相施凱爾今天晚間與烏克蘭總統澤倫斯基通話,提到烏克蘭在戰爭期間暫停選舉是合理之舉,一如英國在第二次世界大戰(1939至1945年)期間。
英國首相府一名發言人表示,施凱爾(Keir Starmer)表達對烏克蘭「民選領導人」澤倫斯基(Volodymyr Zelenskyy)的支持,並重申支持美國尋求足以嚇阻俄羅斯未來不再發動任何侵略的持久和平。
美國總統川普(Donald Trump)今天稱澤倫斯基是不舉行選舉的「獨裁者」,並揚言澤倫斯基最好得加快腳步,否則會丟掉整個國家。
相關發言引發更多疑慮,川普對烏克蘭戰爭及烏俄關係的說法與莫斯科當局歷來說詞有諸多相近,烏克蘭恐遭逼迫接受對侵略方俄羅斯有利的「止戰」條件。
川普今天並批評作為被侵略方、在2022年2月戰爭全面爆發前,曾數次尋求與莫斯科當局溝通遭拒的烏克蘭根本不該「開始」這場戰爭,且烏方原本可與俄方達成交易。
儘管川普稱俄羅斯總統蒲亭(Vladimir Putin)尋求和平、期望終止野蠻殺戮,蒲亭至今未曾喊停對烏侵略。
俄羅斯官方已數次表示,直到達成所有目標,不會停止對烏克蘭的軍事行動。俄方相關目標包括解除烏克蘭武裝、基輔政權更替,以及全面兼併俄軍目前僅部分占領的烏克蘭東、南部4個州。根據西方情資,蒲亭依然有野心要控制整個烏克蘭。
另一方面,儘管美方已表態支持讓歐洲承擔向烏克蘭提供安全保證的主要責任,包括向烏克蘭派兵協助穩定局勢,俄羅斯外長拉夫羅夫(Sergei Lavrov)18日已表明,俄方拒絕有任何北大西洋公約組織(NATO)國家參與的任何形式對烏軍事部署。
烏克蘭總統任期一任5年,澤倫斯基2019年5月就任。烏克蘭原應於2024年春季舉行總統大選,但2022年2月遭俄羅斯全面侵略後,烏克蘭實施戒嚴,依法不得舉行選舉。
莫斯科當局屢以烏克蘭未舉行選舉為由,質疑澤倫斯基總統身分的正當性及代表烏克蘭與各方談判的代表性。然而,蒲亭掌權已25年,期間僅曾短暫卸下總統職務、轉任總理,且未來不排除在有生之年將持續擔任俄羅斯總統。
經數次修法後,俄羅斯總統目前任期一任6年。根據2020年的最近一次相關修憲,蒲亭以及曾在2008至2012年短暫接替他擔任總統的現任國安會副主席麥維德夫(Dmitry Medvedev),兩人在2024年俄羅斯舉行適用新法的總統大選以前歷次總統任期皆一律「歸零」。
也就是說,儘管蒲亭自2000年迄今已5度擔任總統,期間曾兩度各連任一次,中途僅穿插麥維德夫一人,由於新法將他在2024年以前的任期全數「歸零」,在2024年贏得大選、重新起算任期後,蒲亭在2030年仍可再度競選總統,依法連任。屆時若勝選,這將是蒲亭自2012年起連續第4次、也是自2000年起第6次擔任總統。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/4956836

英國首相施凱爾(右)在唐寧街10號官邸會晤烏克蘭總統澤倫斯基。(路透)
〔編譯陳成良/綜合報導〕俄烏戰爭僵持不下,歐洲對美國總統川普可能減少對烏克蘭援助感到憂心。英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)2日在倫敦召開歐洲安全峰會前,敦促歐洲領袖面對「殘酷現實」,增加國防開支。施凱爾並提出實現烏克蘭持久和平的「三要素」:強大的烏克蘭、歐洲的安全保障,以及美國的「後盾」。同時,施凱爾也試圖利用與川普的聯繫,斡旋美烏關係。
英國廣播公司(BBC)報導,峰會召開前,烏克蘭總統澤倫斯基訪英,施凱爾熱情歡迎,更提供了價值高達22.6億英鎊(約台幣935億元)的貸款協議,以支持烏克蘭提升國防能力。施凱爾默強調:「此刻正是團結的關鍵,以確保烏克蘭獲得最佳結局,捍衛歐洲安全。」雙方還討論了如何「以持久公正的和平」結束戰爭。
彭博報導,北約秘書長呂特(Mark Rutte)則敦促澤倫斯基修復與川普的關係,強調:「我們需要美國、烏克蘭和歐洲團結一致。」施凱爾在受訪時表示「沒人想看到」川普和澤倫斯基發生衝突。
倫敦峰會上,除了澤倫斯基,還包括法國總統馬克宏、義大利總理梅洛尼、德國總理蕭茲、加拿大總理杜魯道,以及丹麥、荷蘭、挪威、波蘭、西班牙、芬蘭、瑞典、捷克、羅馬尼亞等國領導人,還有土耳其外交部長。北約秘書長呂特、歐盟執委會主席馮德萊恩和歐洲理事會主席米歇爾也應邀出席。
施凱爾和馬克宏都希望爭取美國的「後盾」支持,以遏制俄羅斯可能的攻擊。英國官員認為,川普對英國的偏好,有助於維持跨大西洋聯盟的穩定。
施凱爾向BBC 表示,他與澤倫斯基、川普、馬克宏的對話,促成了一項協議,英國、法國(可能還有其他一兩個國家)將與烏克蘭合作制定「停止戰鬥的計畫」,然後與美國討論該計畫。他認為這是「朝正確方向邁出的一步」。
BBC分析,外交中,形象很重要。施凱爾公開擁抱澤倫斯基,與白宮的衝突形成對比。澤倫斯基在表達感謝的同時,仍堅定呼籲更多財政和軍事支持。烏克蘭議員表示:「言語無法摧毀俄羅斯戰車。」歐洲各國正在加強對烏克蘭的支持。
儘管面臨挑戰,施凱爾團隊表示不會放棄。前英國國家安全顧問芮基茲(Peter Ricketts)指出,歐洲領袖試圖讓川普意識到歐洲的貢獻,但現在又回到原點,川普可能直接與俄羅斯總統普廷對話。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/4967323

英國首相施凱爾(法新社)
英國「金融時報」及加拿大新聞網站「Todayville」六日披露,英國首相施凱爾政府疑似為了保護英國與中國的貿易和外交關係,干預一起有關英國國會內部中國間諜案的調查,導致兩名原本應該在本月受審的嫌疑人「逃過一劫」。此事已引起在野保守黨議員憤慨,揚言查明由誰下令,施凱爾政府正面臨信任危機。
英國皇家檢察署(CPS)原本將依據「政府機密法」(Official Secrets Act),對在英國國會擔任研究員的卅歲凱希(Christopher Cash)和卅三歲貝瑞(Christopher Berry)提出控訴,指控兩人在二〇二一年末至二三年二月期間,從國會議員交流平台「中國研究小組」(CRG)中蒐集敏感的政治資料,包括對北京持強硬立場的內容,並轉交給中國共產黨第五號人物、中央政治局常委兼中央書記處書記蔡奇。
兩人原定本月受審,但檢方臨時撤銷案件,原因是英國國家安全顧問鮑爾(Jonathan Powell)、國安副顧問柯林斯(Matthew Collins)、外交部常務副大臣羅賓斯(Olly Robbins)及內政部官員,九月間在一場會議中就本案爆發激烈爭執,內政部希望繼續推進本案,但鮑爾、柯林斯和羅賓斯反對,因為他們不希望在英國尋求改善與中國的關係之際,因此案惹惱中國。
當時,柯林斯還告訴內政部,他不願出庭作證指控中國符合「敵人」(任何對我國國家安全構成威脅的國家)定義,而相關證詞是起訴的關鍵要素,因此最後檢方宣布因「證據不足」,無法繼續審理,案件宣告終止。諷刺的是,英國政府今年六月發布、由鮑爾監督的「國家安全戰略報告」中,還指控中國近年加強對英國「間諜活動」,「干涉我國民主、破壞我國經濟安全」。
此事引發英國國會內部憤慨,保守黨籍議員歐布萊恩(Neil O’Brien)表示,「政府故意破壞對兩名替中國監視議員的嫌犯的審判。我是受(中國)制裁的議員之一,我們將查明是誰下令這麼做,我相信此事是由最高層級做出指示」。原本將出庭作證的保守黨議員克恩斯(Alicia Kearns)則說,政府必須「向英國人民公開決策過程,因為起訴(間諜)是為了人民的利益」。
克恩斯還直言,施凱爾有權確保對兩名間諜的審判繼續進行,也必須出面解釋,「他的大臣或大多數高階顧問若非在他完全知情下採取行動,就是違背並蔑視他的意願,進而削弱皇家檢察署提出控訴的能力,究竟是哪一種情況?」對於外界質疑,內閣辦公室發言人反駁稱,唐寧街十號「施壓」要求終止本案的說法「完全錯誤」。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/1727101

外媒指英國首相施凱爾的地位可能面臨挑戰。(路透)
上任僅逾1年的英國工黨首相施凱爾傳出陷入逼宮處境。《衛報》報導,唐寧街10號核心盟友圈擔憂,施凱爾的首相地位可能最快在26日的預算案後面臨挑戰
施凱爾核心圈內的高階幕僚警告,任何以民調下跌為由試圖拉下施凱爾的作法魯莽且危險,恐導致市場、國際關係和工黨陷入動盪。強調無論是在預算案後,或是明年5月地方選舉敗選,施凱爾都會挺身捍衛自己的職務。
被點名是挑戰施凱爾潛在人選的英國衛生部長斯特里廷(Wes Streeting),12日否認此說法,「我不會要求首相辭職,打從他當選工黨領袖起我便支持他」。
《路透》指出,施凱爾帶領工黨在2024年國會大選取得全面性的勝利,但在執政上面臨困境,民調落後給國會議員法拉吉(Nigel Farage)領導的右翼政黨「英國改革黨」(Reform UK)。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5243828

英國首相施凱爾接受《彭博》專訪,強調不會在美中之間選邊站。(彭博)
在美國總統川普揚言對「與中國走太近」的盟友(如加拿大)祭出100%報復性關稅的敏感時刻,英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)卻選擇公開唱反調。他在即將啟程訪問北京前夕,接受《彭博》(Bloomberg)專訪時強硬表態,英國雖然會維持與美國在安全與國防上的緊密關係,但他「不會在美中之間做選擇」,並拒絕接受這種「非黑即白」的二分法。
施凱爾在專訪中為其訪中行程辯護,提出了1套「現實主義」論述。他直言:「把頭埋在沙子裡、無視中國的存在,這是不明智的(wouldn't be sensible)。」
他強調,中國是世界第2大經濟體,這趟睽違8年的英國首相訪中之旅,將為英國企業帶來巨大的商業機會。他回憶道:「當我在處理美英貿易協議時,大家都逼我在美國與歐洲之間選邊,我當時就說:『我不做這種選擇。』」如今面對美中角力,他試圖複製同樣的「雙面討好」策略。
施凱爾在專訪中透露,他將率領數十位英國企業領袖隨行,顯示「經濟利益」是此行核心。雖然他也承諾會向北京提及人權分歧,包括已具英國公民身分、遭港府判刑的《壹傳媒》創辦人黎智英一案。
然而,末代港督彭定康(Chris Patten)對此不以為然。他警告,英國長期以來的對華政策建立在「為了做生意就不敢說真話」的錯誤基礎上。如果施凱爾在會談中只是輕描淡寫地帶過黎智英案,只為了回國好向媒體交差,那將是極度「可悲」(pathetic)的表現。
事實上,施凱爾的「善意」已經付諸行動。就在專訪刊出前幾天,英國政府力排眾議,批准中國在倫敦興建備受爭議的「超級大使館」。這項決定被反對者批評為替中國間諜活動開大門。
面對外界質疑,施凱爾在受訪時重申,處理對中關係若失敗將是「失職」。他批評過去英國對華政策總是「忽冷忽熱」,從一度號稱的「黃金時代」瞬間翻轉為「冰河時期」。他強調,英國政府將拒絕這種極端的二分法選擇,試圖走出一條務實接觸的新路線。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5323443

這次施凱爾中國行沒有搭乘政府專機,而是租用民間大型包機。(美聯社)
英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)28日啟程飛往中國訪問,為前首相梅伊(Theresa May)2018年5月訪中以來,再次有英國首相踏上中國土地。不過,英媒披露,施凱爾這次赴中之行,為反制中方情報機構監控,不僅使用「拋棄式手機、筆電」,也沒搭乘政府專機,而是改租民間包機。
綜合《國際財經時報》、《BBC》、《每日電訊報》、《衛報》等英國媒體報導,施凱爾這次訪中行程,有60名英國商界領袖以及2位高階部長陪同,然而,他們被要求將通訊設備留在家,並改用一次性的設備,包括拋棄式手機、筆電以及臨時SIM卡,這反映了英方真實的恐懼:擔心中國情報機構會試圖監控、攔截或滲透代表團的通訊。
可能令中國感到丟臉的是,這些代表團的成員被警告,即使只是將設備插入電源插座,可能也會導致設備被駭;此外,這些政府官員、商界領袖、隨行記者們,幾乎全員都也被告知,應該預設自己無論在飯店房間還是其他場所,都是「正在遭到偷拍」的狀態。
還不僅如此,這次施凱爾的中國行並沒有搭乘政府專機,而是租用了民間的大型包機。政府對外指出,這是因為代表團及安保、媒體人員人數眾多,才需要較大空間。不過,前英國安全大臣杜耿涵(Tom Tugendhat)就直接在X上發文諷刺中國:「施凱爾不僅使用拋棄式手機,甚至帶了『拋棄式飛機』!」杜耿涵指出,政府專機之所以留在國內,是因為如果飛機停在中國,必須24小時嚴密看守,才能防止中方在機上安裝竊聽器,所以他們乾脆租了一架民航機。
報導指出,這並非妄想,英國安全部門官員多次警告,「中國」代表了前所未有的間諜威脅;過去,2018年梅伊訪中時,就曾有一名中方隨扈在政府專機內拍攝,當時為了避免外交爭議,英方幕僚並未當場對男子提出質疑。另外,就在中國行前夕,英國媒體還爆出,中國駭客曾於2021年至2024年間,駭入三任英國首相的幕僚等高階官員手機,且相關行動不排除延續至今。

英國首相施凱爾(圖中)28日啟程飛往中國訪問,圖為他30日在中國北京參觀豫園。(美聯社)

施凱爾參觀北京故宮。(路透)
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5327480

施凱爾是8年來第一位訪中的英國首相。(美聯社)
英國首相施凱爾近日訪問中國,在英中經濟關係上取得進展後,美國總統川普警告,英國與中國打交道「非常危險」。
《英國廣播公司》(BBC)及《衛報》報導,川普在一部關於他妻子梅蘭妮亞的紀錄片首映會上,被問及對英國加強與中國經貿聯繫的看法時表示:「他們這樣做非常危險。」此前,施凱爾29日與中國國家主席習近平進行3個小時的會談,凸顯先前緊張的兩國關係出現緩和跡象。
施凱爾是8年來首位訪問北京的英國首相,他承諾與中國建立「更成熟」的關係,並爭取更好的市場准入、更低的關稅和投資協議。施凱爾表示,在與習近平會談後,英中關係處於「良好且牢固」的狀態,這次會晤提供「我們所期望的接觸程度」,「我們進行熱情的交流,並取得一些實質的進展,因為英國有很多東西可以貢獻」。
針對川普的言論,唐寧街十號表示,華府方面事先已經知道施凱爾這次訪中及其目標,且強調川普本人也將於4月訪問中國。
川普並未進一步談論英中拉近關係,反而將砲口轉向加拿大,稱「這(與中國合作)對加拿大來說更加危險」,「加拿大的情況並不好,他們做得非常糟糕,你不能指望中國能解決他們的問題」。本週稍早,川普威脅稱,如果加拿大繼續執行總理卡尼近期訪中期間與北京達成的經濟協議,他將對加拿大加徵關稅。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5327309

英國首相施凱爾(左)1月31日飛抵東京,會見有「亞洲鐵娘子」之稱的日本首相高市早苗(右)。英媒分析,相較於施凱爾試圖重啟對中貿易,高市早苗頂住北京壓力、推動供應鏈「去中國化」的強硬路線,更值得英國借鏡。(彭博)
英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)近期試圖重啟與北京的經貿關係,將英中貿易視為待修補的機會。然而,當他飛抵東京會見有「亞洲鐵娘子」之稱的日本首相高市早苗時,雙方對中國的戰略視野呈現強烈對比。英國《每日電訊報》分析指出,面對中國的經濟脅迫,日本透過「去中國化(De-Chinafy)」與供應鏈多元化的實戰經驗,為英國提供了至關重要的戰略啟示。
報導指出,施凱爾的親中路線可能面臨如同德國當年的風險。德國過去為了出口汽車與機械,過度依賴中國市場,結果當中國透過補貼與逆向工程吞噬德國產業優勢後,德國經濟陷入停滯(去年僅成長 0.1%)。
相較之下,日本雖面臨中國更嚴厲的貿易報復,卻因提早佈局而展現韌性。分析認為,高市早苗的經驗顯示,在深化對中貿易前,必須先建立識別並限制依賴的機制,否則國家經濟恐淪為人質。
高市早苗對中國的強硬立場並非空談。去年11月,因她警告「台灣有事即日本生存危機」,引發中國強烈不滿,中國駐大阪總領事薛劍甚至在社群平台X上發表激進言論,揚言要砍斷高市「骯髒的脖子」,北京隨後更祭出1100多項軍民兩用產品的出口禁令。
報導指出,面對安全威脅與經濟制裁,日本並未退縮,反而加速執行《經濟安全保障推進法》。透過巨額國家投資,日本將對中國稀土的依賴度從90%大幅降至60%,並開發出不含稀土的替代技術。分析師指出,日本的策略並非完全斷絕往來,而是透過國家力量強制執行「降低依賴(less China)」,這正是英國目前最缺乏的戰略規劃。
報導最後強調,北京原本意圖藉由經濟制裁打擊高市早苗的選情,但民調顯示她即將在週日的大選中贏得絕對多數,顯示其強硬路線獲得民意支持。高市早苗更在訪談中重申對日美同盟與台海安全的承諾:「如果美軍受襲而日本只會逃跑,同盟將會崩潰。」這番言論被視為是在提醒搖擺不定的英國:在印太地緣政治中,戰略模糊的空間已越來越小。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5328872

英國保守黨領袖巴登諾克在國會嚴厲批評首相施凱爾,對中國採取「軟弱且短視」的策略,譏諷他此行除了帶回一個「Labubu玩偶」外,幾乎一無所獲,甚至還要擔心玩偶裡是否藏有竊聽器。(法新社檔案照)
英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)近期結束訪問中國行程返國,隨即在國會面臨反對黨的猛烈砲火。保守黨領袖巴登諾克(Kemi Badenoch,見圖,歐新社檔案照)三日在下議院嚴厲批評施凱爾,對中國採取「軟弱且短視」的策略,譏諷他此行除了帶回一個「Labubu玩偶」外,幾乎一無所獲,甚至還要擔心玩偶裡是否藏有竊聽器。
綜合英國和香港媒體報導,施凱爾在發言時試圖為其「務實接觸」的對中政策辯護。他強調,自己對於來自中國的威脅有著「清楚認知」,但英國不能無視中國做為全球第二大經濟體的地緣政治現實,英國可以在保護自身利益的同時,也尋求與中國合作的機會,「這也是本次出訪的核心精神」。他認為,透過高層對話,才能在分歧中尋求突破。
巴登諾克在質詢時直言,儘管中國是全球大國,也是經濟上無法迴避的現實,英國理應與其接觸,但問題在於施凱爾展現的姿態過於軟弱。她認為施凱爾此行成果貧乏,形容他帶回來的戰利品,似乎只有一個Labubu玩偶,「希望有人檢查那個玩偶,確認裡面有沒有被裝了竊聽器。」
針對中方在施凱爾訪問期間,宣布解除對包括四位下議院議員在內的共六位英國國會議員的制裁,施凱爾將其視為此行的重要勝利與善意指標。但巴登諾克對此嗤之以鼻,她認為這根本是中方的「順水人情」,甚至是對英國的羞辱。
巴登諾克指出,這些議員當初之所以會被制裁,正是因為他們勇於對抗中國,批評其違反人權的行為,「最糟糕的是,首相宣稱為四位保守黨下議院議員解除制裁是多麼了不起的勝利。」
她強調,這些被制裁的議員根本不想去中國,北京當局也心知肚明;中方只是做出「根本不花一毛錢」的無成本讓步,就換得英國首相的感激,為什麼施凱爾看不出來這是對方的統戰手法?她認為施凱爾完全「被耍了」,並以英國批准中國在倫敦市中心新建大使館,形容他在飛機尚未起飛前,就已經先向北京繳了「贖金」。
此外,巴登諾克更列舉一連串具體議題,質問施凱爾到底取得何種實質進展。她質問,這趟行程為遭監禁的香港壹傳媒創辦人黎智英做了什麼?答案是「什麼也沒有」;中國是否承諾停止在俄烏戰爭中助長俄羅斯對抗英國的行動?聽起來完全沒有。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/paper/1742675

英國首相施凱爾5日發表演說前,談到前駐美大使曼德森任命案。(美聯社)
美國司法部公布已故富商艾普斯坦(Jeffrey Epstein)相關檔案,揭露英國前駐美大使曼德森(Peter Mandelson)與這名犯罪者的關係密切,使英國首相施凱爾陷入政治風暴。施凱爾5日為任命曼德森,向艾普斯坦性犯罪受害者道歉。
《法新社》、《衛報》5日報導,正為自己仕途未來搏鬥的施凱爾,在任命曼德森之決定引發排山倒海的抨擊聲浪數天後,5日為這項人事決策向艾普斯坦案受害者道歉。施凱爾說「對不起」、「為發生在你們身上的事情、為那麼多有權力的人辜負了你們、為我相信曼德森的謊言並且任命他道歉」。
曼德森2024年12月獲施凱爾提名為駐美大使,並於去年2月上任,但是上任僅7個月,去年9月就因他與艾普斯坦的私交受到爭議,而遭解除大使職務。美國司法部今年1月30日公布的最新一批艾普斯坦相關文件,進一步揭露曼德森與艾普斯坦的深厚關係,兩人不僅私交密切,甚至有金錢關係。這些新曝光內幕,令施凱爾的用人判斷和決策倍受質疑,包括執政的工黨在內,一些批評者甚至質疑他是否還適任首相一職。
施凱爾5日在發表一場演說前,談到此事,表示他提名曼德森,曼德森一再說謊,他當時並不知道曼德森與艾普斯坦的關係「深厚程度和黑暗面」。面對是否會繼續擔任首相的問題,施凱爾細述他的施政優先要務,然後說「我打算繼續完成這些關鍵工作」。
不過,施凱爾4日接受國會質詢,證實任命時已知曼德森與艾氏有私交,已令工黨議員深感不滿,愈加不願意挺身為他辯護。議員4日表決一項修正案,強制政府向國會提供任命曼德森過程的所有文件,以及他與艾氏關係的詳細資料。
工黨議員透納(Karl Turner)5日在電台訪問時說,「昨天的氣氛,是我16年來所見過工黨議員最憤怒的」,「我們不能假裝這不是危機狀態」。保守黨黨魁巴登諾克(Kemi Badenoch)5日表示,施凱爾的職位「顯然無法繼續」,力促工黨議員支持對首相進行不信任投票,她說,施凱爾下台「是遲早、而非是否的問題」。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5334264

英國首相施凱爾(右二,紅圈處)訪問中國後返國,在國會被電到臭臉。(圖翻攝自X:@Conservatives)
首次上稿 02-04 01:00
更新時間 02-04 06:18
英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)上週到中國進行國是訪問,大肆吹噓中國行成果,加上其內閣批准中國在倫敦新建「超級大使館」,種種親中行徑引發英國社會反彈。英國保守黨黨魁和反對黨領袖巴德諾赫(Kemi Badenoch)週二在國會殿堂電爆施凱爾的親中路線,施凱爾被電到擺出一張臭臉的畫面在網上瘋傳,引發熱議。
英國保守黨3日在官方X分享曾任商業暨貿易大臣巴德諾赫在下議院的犀利質詢片段。片中可以看到,巴德諾赫對著列席的施凱爾等官員表示,「現在,讓我們來談談中國。英國當然應該和中國來往,儘管他們是一個試圖破壞我們國家利益的威權國家,儘管有時他們就在這座國會的牆內監聽我們(諷刺先前爆出中國間諜滲透英國會一事),儘管他們資助世界各地來敵視我國,還是無法否認他們是全球強權,也是無法忽視的經濟體。」
「所以這裡我要講清楚,我們質疑的不是首相與中國來往這件事,我們批評的是他軟弱又短視近利的做法(在野議員響起一片贊同聲)。我相信首相本意是好的,但他的談判手法一向都是『先把一切都給出去』,然後『希望對方會因此對他好一點』(在野議員此時響起一片嘲笑聲)。首相甚至飛機都還沒上,就已經展現他願意不惜一切來證明自己和中國關係很好的樣子。但要知道的是,中國向來每一個動作,都是在為自己爭取更有利的談判位置。」
巴德諾赫繼續說道:「首相看起來在這趟行程玩得很開心,事實上這趟行程對一個一生立場都被認為是在親共的人來說,這確實就像美夢成真(議席嘲笑聲越來越大,巴德諾赫刻意停下,讓笑聲結束)。撇開首相先生行李箱裡那個拉布布玩偶(Labubu,中國知名玩偶)不說……,喔對了,希望他確認過那個拉布布沒有被裝竊聽器,他幾乎是空手而回。我們都希望蘇格蘭威士忌能有更低的關稅,但如果首相願意像我兩個禮拜前那樣實際跟威士忌業者談過,那他就會知道,他們真正需要的是便宜的能源和更低的整體稅負。」
「那他拿到了什麼?免簽證入境?中國早就對其他國家提供這種待遇了,這個成果根本配不上一次首相級的訪問。但最糟糕的是,首相竟然把『解除4名保守黨國會議員的制裁』包裝成一個偉大的勝利,就好像是施捨給我們的一樣。我要告訴他,那些議員之所以被制裁,是因為他們勇於對抗中國(在野再次響起讚許聲),他們挺身反對人權侵害,他們敢用首相不敢用的方式,挺身對抗中國監聽我國議員。那些人根本不想去中國,中方自己也知道,他們知道自己在給施凱爾一個沒用的『禮物』!為什麼我們堂堂大英國首相就看不出來?」
巴德諾赫酸施凱爾完全被中國玩弄於股掌間,「中國還準備在倫敦市中心蓋一座大型間諜據點,而這個據點是首相連飛機都沒上就必須先付的『贖金』!我絕不會允許英國被如此挾持。首相在談判桌上,把英國談成了在世界上又更弱勢的國家,他的整體經濟政策,就是對企業課更多稅、管制更嚴格,然後能源價格漲到英國被迫去工業化,接著再進口中國製的風機、中國製太陽能板、中國製電動車電池……這些產品全都來自一個每隔一週就新蓋一座燃煤發電廠的國家。」
「施凱爾去中國有談過這些議題嗎?他的訪問有為黎智英爭取到什麼嗎?沒有!中國有承諾停止為普廷在烏克蘭戰爭中提供支援嗎?看起來也沒有!為正在被奴役的維吾爾人帶來什麼改變?完全沒有!中國有同意停止網路攻擊嗎?有嗎?大家心知肚明。現實就是,中國展現了實力,英國被人牽著鼻子走。這也難怪習近平會稱讚工黨,因為真正挺身捍衛英國的是保守黨,英國是個偉大的貿易國家,我們當然應該與其他國家往來,包括敵對國家,但我們必須睜大眼睛,站在有利的位置上跟對方來往,我們需要的是一位把國家利益擺在第一位的首相與政府!」
巴德諾赫發表這段談話的過程中,鏡頭數次帶到施凱爾,可以看到施凱爾的臉非常臭。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5331710
在美國與伊朗戰事持續升溫之際,美英兩國之間的政治摩擦也逐漸浮上檯面。美國總統川普週六(7 日)表示,英國正「認真考慮」向中東派遣兩艘航空母艦,但他同時補充說,美國並不需要英國的協助也能贏得與伊朗的戰爭。
根據《路透》報導,川普近期多次批評英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer),並在本週暗示,倫敦最初阻止美國使用英國基地對伊朗發動攻擊,等同於「破壞」了兩國長期以來歷史悠久且密切的關係。
川普在其社群平台 Truth Social 上發文表示,他將「記住」英國在與伊朗衝突期間所展現出的支持不足。
他寫道:「英國,我們曾經偉大的盟友,也許是所有盟友中最偉大的一個,如今終於開始認真考慮向中東派出兩艘航空母艦。」
川普接著表示:「沒關係,施凱爾首相,我們已經不需要它們了——但我們會記住。我們不需要那些在我們已經打贏戰爭之後才加入的人!」
在川普發表這則貼文之前,英國國防部週六表示,正準備讓「威爾斯親王號」航空母艦(HMS Prince of Wales)進入可部署狀態。
不過,一名英國官員指出,目前尚未就是否真的派遣該航母前往中東做出最終決定。
施凱爾則為自己先前拒絕讓美軍使用英國基地支援對伊朗初期打擊的決定辯護。他表示,在批准任何軍事行動前,必須先確認該行動在法律上是正當的,且已經過充分規劃。
隨後,他已批准美軍使用英國基地,進行他所稱的「防禦性打擊」,目標包括伊朗的飛彈儲存設施或發射裝置。
當被問及川普的言論時,英國外交大臣古柏(Yvette Cooper)週日(8 日)表示:「做這份工作讓我學到的一件事是,你必須專注於實質內容,而不是社群媒體上的貼文。」
她補充說:「我們不會以誇張或情緒化的言辭來做決策。我們會以務實、冷靜且穩定的方式來做決定。因為我認為,英國更廣泛的國家性格其實就是以嚴肅而穩健的方式行事。」

英國首相施凱爾擬向中東派遣數千架「防空攔截無人機」,來回應美國總統川普與部分軍事人士對其在伊朗戰爭中「反應軟弱」的批評。(路透)
屢遭美國總統川普批評對美國打擊伊朗的行動缺乏支持,英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)傳出可能向中東派遣數千架「防空攔截無人機」,來防禦伊朗的無人機攻勢。
據《每日電訊報》報導,英國首相施凱爾擬向中東派遣數千架「防空攔截無人機」,來回應美國總統川普與部分軍事人士對其在伊朗戰爭中「反應軟弱」的批評。
這種「Octopus(章魚)」反無人機攔截系統是由烏克蘭設計,目前正在英國生產,產量正迅速提升,目標是每月生產數千架,這種防空攔截無人機可用來「獵殺」空中的敵方無人機與巡弋飛彈。
1名國防消息人士向《每日電訊報》表示,英國正在考慮部署攔截無人機,以對抗俄羅斯與伊朗之間的「侵略軸心」。該消息人士表示:「烏克蘭人在攔截這些無人機方面是最有經驗的,因為他們過去4年一直在做這件事。」
另外,英國政府目前也正在考慮向波斯灣部署軍艦,但尚未做出最終決定。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5370719

英國首相施凱爾。(路透檔案照)
英國首相施凱爾今天證實,英國不支持美國對荷姆茲海峽(Strait of Hormuz)實施封鎖,並重申英國的優先要務是確保海峽重新開放、國際航運恢復。
施凱爾(Keir Starmer)說,英國持續與盟友討論促成荷姆茲海峽重新開放的可行方案,且英國具備必要的掃雷能力,可用於排除伊朗佈設的水雷。根據英國官方迄今公開說法,掃雷預計在戰火停歇後才會展開。
美國與伊朗在巴基斯坦斡旋下,於巴國首都伊斯蘭馬巴德(Islamabad)馬拉松談判21小時未有成果後,美國總統川普(Donald Trump)12日在社群媒體貼文揚言,美國海軍將展開對荷姆茲海峽的封鎖,適用所有試圖進入或離開海峽的船舶。
川普宣告,已指示美國海軍在國際水域查禁所有曾向伊朗繳交海峽通行費的船舶,且美國將著手摧毀伊朗在海峽埋設的水雷。
川普揚言,任何曾向伊朗繳交非法通行費的人都別想在公海上安全航行;此外,伊朗透過埋設水雷勒索各界,但美國絕不容許被勒索。
不過,儘管川普聲稱「其他國家將參與此次封鎖」,施凱爾今天接受英國媒體採訪時,證實英國不支持美方封鎖、不會參與相關行動,且將持續避免被捲入戰火。
施凱爾說,只要荷姆茲海峽依然被封閉或者船舶無法依該有方式自由通行,即意味石油和天然氣無法進入市場,物價將上漲、能源帳單金額將增加,而他不希望看見這樣的情況。
施凱爾重申,目前最要緊的是促成海峽開放,且「完全開放」。儘管不認同川普對荷姆茲海峽實施封鎖,施凱爾提到,問題主要還是在伊朗首先關閉或局部關閉海峽。
另一方面,被視為與執政黨工黨親近的英國智庫「意決基金會」(Resolution Foundation)今天發布研究結果,呈現中東戰火對英國民眾生活水準的衝擊。參考各項市場定價,受戰爭影響,英國中位數勞動年齡家庭今年可運用收入預計將減少480英鎊(約新台幣2萬元)。
基金會評估,戰爭爆發前,英國一般家庭原可預期收入成長0.9%,如今收入反而恐下滑0.6%。造成這個現象的主要原因包括能源價格上揚,且儘管美國與伊朗近日宣布停火14天,這項消息對能源市場行情的影響有限。
英國財政大臣里夫斯(Rachel Reeves)預計本週稍晚宣布,政府將採取哪些措施進一步協助英國企業與民眾挺過物價壓力。在此之前,里夫斯將出席13至18日在華府舉行的國際貨幣基金(IMF)和世界銀行(World Bank)春季會議。
里夫斯1日接受英國廣播公司第2電台(BBC Radio 2)採訪時不諱言,她「對川普選擇在中東地區開戰感到憤怒」。
里夫斯說,這是一場「沒有明確退場方案的戰爭」,因此英國「不願加入」。
里夫斯提到,英國政府的借貸成本已飆升至「突破天際」,而英國本身「未做出任何導致(借貸)成本如此攀升的事」。
里夫斯認為,川普的決策正讓各界陷入貨真價實的艱難處境,「人們可看到,川普在中東地區的所作所為將給世界各地帶來經濟挑戰」,潛在挑戰包括通貨膨脹加劇、經濟成長放緩、稅收減少。
除了里夫斯,施凱爾9日也罕見對川普的對外作為發出較尖銳批評。施凱爾在中東訪問期間告訴英國獨立電視台(ITV),英國家戶和企業不得不承受能源帳單金額上下波動,他對這個情況簡直「受夠了」(fed up)。
施凱爾說,能源帳單金額如此上下波動,起因是俄羅斯總統普廷(Vladimir Putin)「或是川普在世界各地的所作所為」。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5402673

美國總統川普再次抨擊英國在伊朗衝突期間的作為,並重申將英國首相施凱爾比作前首相張伯倫的嘲諷。(美聯社檔案照)
儘管美國總統川普12日聲稱,美國將在北大西洋公約組織(NATO)盟國協助下,封鎖荷姆茲海峽(Strait of Hormuz),但據英國「衛報」瞭解,倫敦將不會參與任何封鎖該海峽的行動。
「清理海峽不需要花太多時間。」川普在接受福斯新聞(Fox News)訪問時表示,並聲稱「許多國家將會幫助我們」,提到英國與其他國家正在派遣掃雷艦。
報導指出,英國此前曾暗示,可在確保荷姆茲海峽安全通行方面發揮作用,而且在該地區已部署獵雷系統與反無人機能力。但白廳(Whitehall,英國政府的代稱)內部一直擔心,順從川普派艦的要求,可能會使危機升級。英國願意考慮在掃雷行動中出力,被視為與川普的封鎖提議截然不同。
一名政府發言人表示,英國將繼續「支持航行自由與荷姆茲海峽的開放,這是支持全球經濟與國內生活成本所迫切需要的。」並強調「荷姆茲海峽絕不能被收取通行費。我們正緊急與法國及其他合作夥伴合作,組成一個廣泛的聯盟來保護航行自由。」
英國首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)曾表示,歐洲盟國、波斯灣合作夥伴與美國之間正在進行會談,以制定一項「可信且可行的計畫」。
在川普發表關於封鎖荷姆茲海峽的言論數小時前,英國衛生大臣斯特里廷(Wes Streeting)批評他對伊朗的言論「具煽動性、挑釁且令人無法容忍」。川普再次抨擊英國在伊朗衝突期間的作為,並重申將施凱爾比作前首相張伯倫(Neville Chamberlain)的嘲諷。
川普說:「施凱爾先生說我們會在戰爭結束後送出裝備」,這些話是「張伯倫式的發言」。
這並非川普首次將施凱爾比作因對希特勒(Adolf Hitler)採取綏靖政策,而長期受到批評的張伯倫,但施凱爾並未對川普的嘲諷做出具體回應。在川普12日發表評論前,由於談判失敗,川普宣稱美國將封鎖荷姆茲海峽,施凱爾敦促美國與伊朗「找出解決之道」。
在12日上午與阿曼蘇丹海賽姆(Haitham bin Tariq Al Said)會談後,施凱爾也呼籲繼續維持停火。
在華府與德黑蘭長達21小時的談判於12日凌晨結束,且未能達成協議後,7日宣布的脆弱2週停火協議已陷入不確定性。在巴基斯坦參與談判的美國副總統范斯(JD Vance)表示,伊朗拒絕承諾不製造核武,是未能達成協議的原因。
斯特里廷在接受天空新聞網(Sky News)訪問時表示,美伊談判的失敗令人失望,但未來談判的成功對「我們所有人的利益」是必要的。「因此,雖然這些談判可能沒有以成功告終,但這並不表示著繼續嘗試沒有價值。」
英國本週將主辦與多國聯盟的進一步會談,討論重新開放荷姆茲海峽航運通道。這場會議是在施凱爾與川普談論需要制定「實際計畫」,讓船隻通過該地區之後舉行的;施凱爾也曾表示,他對川普在中東的行動對英國公眾所造成的影響,「受夠了」。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5401760
英國首相施凱爾麻煩大了!隨時有可能會下台。
一來,本身的流年走到衰運了。再來,曾任命美國大使的人選捲入艾普斯坦的醜聞當中,識人不清,就被點名「倒數計時」了。再來,四月下旬開始,國內會有金融危機、或遭恐攻;暑假的七、八月份裡又有一波危機。隨時都有可能會要下台哦!
(占星師 馬龍
4-14-2026H1)

英國首相施凱爾20日赴下議院說明爭議人事任命細節。(法新社)
前英國駐美大使曼德森(Peter Mandelson)因與美國已故性犯罪富豪艾普斯坦私交甚篤,以及傳出與中國存在商業聯繫等因素,沒能通過攸關國家安全的背景審查,使得英國首相施凱爾飽受非議,領導人地位可能在本週受到嚴峻挑戰。
在美國政府陸續公開的艾普斯坦檔案中,包括2008年曼德森所撰寫的電子郵件。他在信中對當時面對招募未成年賣淫指控的艾普斯坦表達支持。施凱爾隨即在去年9月解除曼德森大使職務,並在第一時間表示對這項任命感到後悔。
保守黨黨魁巴登諾克(Kemi Badenoch)19日的一封公開信中,責備施凱爾的錯誤任命「不僅傷害了英美關係,侮辱戀童犯艾普斯坦的受害者,還藉由將最高外交職務交付給具高度疑慮者,削弱了我們的國家安全。」
政府高階人士向「衛報」表示,儘管在伊朗危機上處置得宜,但要是有更多不利資訊曝光,或是工黨議員失去信心,本週可能就是決定施凱爾前途的關鍵時期。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5410261

前英國駐美國大使曼德森(右)的醜聞持續延燒,已有工黨國會議員要求首相施凱爾(左)下台。(法新社檔案照)
前英國駐美國大使曼德森(Peter Mandelson)的醜聞持續延燒,首相施凱爾(Keir Starmer)的誠信問題成為外界批評焦點。執政黨工黨國會議員布萊許(Jonathan Brash)22日開出第一槍,公開表態指施凱爾應為曼德森的醜聞下台。
代表哈特浦(Hartlepool)選區的布萊許在「英國新聞頻道」(GB News)的「首相答問現場」(PMQs Live)節目中直言,他對西敏寺(Westminster)上演的這齣心理劇,以及施凱爾政府核心不斷出包感到「徹底厭煩」。
布萊許表示,工黨有非常棒的地方議員、助選員和運動人士,在全國各地努力工作,為他們的選區兌現承諾,卻在即將面臨地方選舉之際,籠罩在這場絕對是一團糟的陰影之下,「他們(政府高層)真的需要振作起來」。
布萊許說,「我對此感到徹底厭煩」;他認為,就施凱爾而言,問題已經不是「會不會」下台,而是「何時」下台。
「我認為我們必須控制住這個局面,因為民眾擔心的是他們的生活成本、國民保健署(NHS),以及街頭犯罪問題,而我們卻完全被這場醜聞所吞噬,這是完全無法接受的。」
布萊許強調:「我相信你可以看得出來,我對此相當憤怒。」「我認為沒有人會合理地期待,首相能帶領工黨進入下一次大選。」
曼德森因為捲入美國已故性犯罪富豪艾普斯坦(Jeffrey Epstein)醜聞,去年9月遭解職,在任僅7個月。英國媒體近日踢爆,曼德森去年2月赴任前,根本未通過該職位應通過的英國政府「高階安全審查」,相關報導引發軒然大波。
不過,除了與艾普斯坦的交情,更引發安全疑慮的是,在施凱爾2024年12月20日宣布任命曼德森為駐美大使之前,內閣辦公廳的適任評估盡職調查報告即示警,曼德森在中國與俄羅斯的政商關係,恐對英國政府造成「聲譽風險」。
此外,在前首相布萊爾(Tony Blair)執政的1997至2007年間,曼德森即曾兩度因醜聞去職,而且兩次皆涉及操守與誠信問題。
施凱爾20日在國會就曼德森的人事案風波發表聲明,並接受質詢,坦承他個人的「錯誤判斷」確實是問題核心,「我不該任命曼德森(為駐美大使)」,「我對這項決策負責」。
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/world/breakingnews/5414165
| 歡迎光臨 馬龍占星論壇 (http://astromalon.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |